Association Between Computer Vision Syndrome And Attention In Workers

Sansan R Arjuna, Titiek Ernawati, Edith M Djaputra

Abstract


Introduction: Nowadays, digital devices are rapidly growing and demanding everybody to use a computer or laptop for daily life, such as working, studying, playing games. Generally, the eye problem goes parallel with the growth of technology. Eyes problem related to the use of the computer, such as dry eyes, tired eyes, blurred eyes, and it is called Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). Attention is a process that restricts much information that needs to be received and has a vital role in maintaining cognitive function. Attention is affected by the sensory stimulus, especially from the eyes. That is why CVS might influence attention. If the attention becomes distracted, it will affect studying or working performance. Aim: To analyze the association between CVS and attention in Workers. Methods: Cross-sectional is used in this research, and the sampling method was consecutive sampling. Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire and Trail Making Test part B is the instrument for this research Result: Respondents with CVS was 59,2%, disturbed attention was 63,2%, both CVS and disturbed attention was 40,8%. Chi-square trial showed p=0,110, which means that there is no association between CVS and attention. Conclusion: There is no association between CVS and attention in Workers.

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF

References


Lurati AR. Computer Vision Syndrome: Implications for the Occupational Health Nurse [Internet]. Vol. 66, Workplace Health and Safety. California: California State University; 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 25]. p. 56–60. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975849

Loh K, Reddy SC. Understanding and Preventing Computer Vision Syndrome [Internet]. Vol. 3, Malaysian Family Physician. 2008 [cited 2019 May 4]. p.128–30. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170366/

Akinbinu TR, Mashalla YJ. Medical Practice and Review Impact of

Computer Technology on Health: Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) [Internet]. Vol. 5, Medical Practice and Review. academic journals; 2014 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. p. 20–30. Available from: http://www.academicjournals.org/MPR

Dessie A, Adane F, Nega A, Wami SD, Chercos DH. Computer Vision Syndrome and Associated Factors among Computer Users in Debre Tabor Town, Northwest Ethiopia [Internet]. Vol. 2018, Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 24]. p. 1–8. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327684034_Computer_Vision_Syndrome_and_Associated_Factors_among_Computer_Users_in_Debre_Tabor_Town_Northwest_Ethiopia

Aisyah M, Koesyanto H, Mardiana. Unnes Journal of Public Health VISION SYNDROME (CVS) PADA PEKERJA RENTAL KOMPUTER DI [Internet]. Vol. 2. 2015 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. p. 48–57. Available from: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujph/article/view/6372

Ling J, Catling J. PSIKOLOGI KOGNITIF. Rahmat R, Maulana A, editors. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga; 2012.

Spagna A, Martella D, Sebastiani M, Maccari L, Marotta A, Casagrande M. Efficiency and Interactions of Alerting, Orienting and Executive Networks: The Impact of Imperative Stimulus Type. Vol. 148, Acta Psychologica. Elsevier B.V.; 2014. p. 209–15.

Cardona G, García C, Serés C,Vilaseca M, Gispets J. Blink Rate, Blink Amplitude, and Tear Film Integrity during Dynamic Visual Display Terminal Tasks [Internet]. Vol. 36, Current Eye Research. 2011 [cited 2019 Apr 4]. p. 190–7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21275516

Laberge D, Samuel SJ. Cognitive Psychology 6. In Minnesota: University of Minnesota; 1974. p. 293–323.

Mangen A, Walgermo BR,Brønnick K. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension [Internet]. Vol. 58, International Journal of Educational Research. Elsevier Ltd; 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 31]. p. 61–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

Gaudino EA, Geisler MW, Squires NK. Construct Validity in the Trail Making Test: What Makes Part BHarder? Vol. 17, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1995. p. 529–35.

Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. Digital Eye Strain: Prevalence, Measurement and Amelioration [Internet]. Vol. 3, BMJ Open Ophthalmology. 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 14]. p. e000146. Available from: https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000146

Ranasinghe P, Wathurapatha WS, Perera YS, Lamabadusuriya DA, Kulatunga S, Jayawardana N, et al. Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: An evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. Vol. 9, BMC Research Notes. BioMed Central;2016. p. 1–9.

Junco R, Cotten SR. No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance [Internet]. Vol. 59, Computers and Education. Elsevier Ltd; 2012 [cited 2019 Oct 31]. p. 505–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023.

OCTH 6260-Spring-Assessment Rating Form I. General Information Title of the test: Trail Making Test (TMT) [Internet]. 1944 [cited 2019 Feb 28].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/jwmj.v2i2.2476

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.