KONSEP DIRI PADA INDIGO DEWASA AWAL

Maria Dini Prasetio

Abstract


Indigo phenomenon in Indonesia at few moments have been trending topic in society. This phenomenon receive every positive or negative view of points in society. Indigo individuals are individual that have a differents potency for every indigo, which is ESP experience (Extrasensory Perception), sensitive, and rational. The purpose of this research is obtain a picture of the self concept’s development. This study uses a qualitative case study method through an interview on early adults aged 18-40 years old and have ESP experience (Extrasensory Perception) since child. There are two participants in this research. The analysis technique that used is inductive technique. This research use two kinds validity such as comunicative and argumentative validitas. Research result show that indigo individuals since child feels different between normal people. They feel special with their advantages and sometimes get different treatment with negative view from society and their family. The views and over-treatment related to their ability resulted indigo individuals not being open to their environment. Early adults who are indigo tend to be forced accept their advantages. Their self concept development influenced by their parents, family, and friendship environment. Early adults who are indigo saw indigo as a permanent ability, which couldn’t be eliminated or easily rejected.

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustiani, H. (2006). Psikologi perkembangan: pendekatan ekologi kaitannya dengan konsep diri dan penyesuain diri pada remaja. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Apsari, I. (2009). Gambaran konsep diri pada remaja akhir indigo (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Arip, M.A.B.M & Yong, Y.M. (2015). Development of indigo check list: the concern of malaysian society for needs of indigo children. International Journal of Education and Research, 30 (10), 23-34.

Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-regulatory mechanisms. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation: Nebraska Symposium on motivation, 38, 69-164. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Diunduh tanggal 9 Juni 2019 dari: https://psych415.class.uic.edu/Readings/Bandura,%20Self-efficacy%20&%20motivation,%20NebSymMotive,%201991.pdf

Baron, R.A., Byrne, D., & Branscombe, N.R. (2006). Social psychology. (11th edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bart, Smet. (1994). Psikologi kesehatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Carrol, L & Tober, J. (1999). The indigo children: the new kids have arrived. USA: Hay House.

Chapman, W.H & Flynn, C. (2007). The complete idiot’s guide to indigo children. USA: Penguin Group.

Cox, F.D. (1978). Human intimacy, marriage, the family and it’s meaning. Minnesata: West Publishing, Co.

Deaux, K., Dane, F.C., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1993). Social psychology in the 90’s. (Edisi ke-6). New York: Brooks & Cole Publishing.

Desmita. (2006). Psikologi perkembangan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Feist, J & Gregory J. Feist. (2006). Theories of personality (6th edition). United States: McGraw-Hill Companies. Inc.

Fitts, W.H. (1971). The self consept and self actualization. California: Western Psychological Service.

Hawka, F.Z. (2012). Misteri indra keenam pada anak. Jogjakarta: Laksana.

Helmi, A.F. (1999). Gaya kelekatan dan konsep diri. Jurnal Psikologi, 01, 9-17.

Kartono, K. (1980). Pengantar metodologi research sosial. Bandung: Alumni.

Leonard & Supardi. (2010). Pengaruh konsep diri, sikap siswa pada matematika, dan kecemasan siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 29 (3), 341-352.

Lestari, S. (2008). Pengasuhan orang tua dan harga diri remaja: studi meta analisis. Anima Indonesian Psychologycal Journal, 24 (01), 17-25.

Meinarno, E.A & Sarwono, S.W. (2018). Psikologi sosial. (Edisi ke-2). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Neumann, E. (1964). Mystical man. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ, Press.

Papalia, D.E., Old, S.W., & Feldman, R.D. (2008). Human development. New York: McGrawHill.

Poerwandari, E.K. (1998). Pendekatan kualitatif dalam penelitian psikologi. Depok: Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi (LPSP3).

Prince, H. (2010). I am indigo. UK: Andrews UK Limited.

Puguh, O. (2012). Buku lengkap tentang anak indigo. Jogjakarta: FlashBooks.

Santrock, J.W. (2012). Life-span development (14th edition). New York: The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.

Sarantakos, S. (1993). Social research. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Slameto. (2006). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supratiknya, A. (2016). Komunikasi antarpribadi tinjauan psikologi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Taylor, S.E., Letitia, A.P., & Sears, D.O. (2009). Psikologi sosial. (Edisi ke-12). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Virtue, D. (2001). The care and feeding of indigo children. USA: Hay House.

Weningsari, N. (2010). Studi komprehensif mengenai anak indigo (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Surakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Program Studi Psikologi Universitas Sebelas Maret.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/exp.v7i2.2729