THE EFFECT OF BUDGET PARTICIPATION ON MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE WITH COST MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE AS A MODERATED VARIABLES

Sharon Kristiani

Abstract


This study empirically examines the effect of budget participation on managerial performance and the moderating effect of cost management knowledge on the effect of budget participation on managerial performance. The population and sample in this study are middle and lower-level managers in manufacturing companies in East Java, Indonesia, who met the criteria. The sampling technique was convenience sampling with a sample of 83 people. The research hypothesis was tested using multivariable regression analysis. The results showed that the higher the level of budget participation, the higher the managerial performance. The high level of participation is accompanied by the high knowledge of managers about cost management affecting managerial performance. Thus, this research shows that budget participation affects managerial performance. Further research on the variable cost management knowledge found that knowledge of cost management as a quasi-moderator moderates the relationship between budget participation and managerial performance.


Save to Mendeley


Keywords


Budget participation, cost management knowledge, managerial performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agbejule, L., and Saarikoski, L. (2006). The Effect of Cost Management Knowledge On The Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance. The British Accounting Review 38 (1), 427– 440.

Angelina, N. (2018). The effect of environmental uncertainty the influence of managerial performance with management accounting systems as a moderation variable in manufacturing companies in Surabaya. (Thesis, Widya Mandala Catholic University Undergraduate Program, Surabaya, Indonesia) Obtained from http://repository.wima.ac.id/13805/, 10 September 2020, 17.32 WIB.

Aziz. (2014). Analysis of the Effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on the Quality of Sustainability Report. Audit Journal and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of Jungpura, 3 (2), 65-84

Blumberg, M., and Pringle, C. (1982). The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. Academy of Management Review.

Dharmanegara. (2018). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Business Strategy, and Small Medium Enterprise's Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.

Farahmita, A. (2013). Effect of Job Satisfaction and knowledge of Cost Management and Relationship between Participation Ang-reward with Managerial Performance. Journal of the National Accounting Simposium XVI Manado.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 23 Program (8th ed.). Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

Hage, J., and Mintzberg, H. (1980). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of Research. Administrative Science Quarterly.

Hasan, H. (2018). The Role of Budgetary Control on Managerial Performance in Fertilizer Companies in Indonesia. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization, and Economics, 1 (2), 138-148.

Mardiasmo. (2002). Public sector accounting. Yogyakarta Journal.

Nafarin, M. (2013). Corporate Budgeting Journal 10.

Narsa, I., and Yuniawati, R. (2003). The Influence of the Interaction Between Total Quality Management With Performance Measurement Systems And Reward Systems On Managerial. Journal of Accounting and Finance.

Nasution, A. (2005). Monetary cooperation in East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics.

Sadha, Stivanus. (2015) The influence of total quality management, budget systems, and reward systems on managerial performance at PT. KAI drop 8 Surabaya.(Thesis, Widya Mandala Catholic University Undergraduate Program, Surabaya, Indonesia). Obtained from HTTP://repository.wima.ac.id/16347/,July 25, 2020, 18.26.

Sagala, R. (2009). Theoretical basis. Obtained from https://www.landasanteori.com, 30 August 2020, at 12:20 p.m.

Sartika. (2017). Analysis of the Effect of the Performance Measurement System on Managerial Performance through Clarity of Roles and Psychological Empowerment as Variables Moderating. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8 (1), 1-15.

Scully, J., Kirkpatrick, S., and Locke, E., (1995). Locus of knowledge as a determinant of the effects of participation on performance, affect, and perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 276–288.

Shields, M., and Young, M. (1998). Managing innovation costs: a study of cost-conscious awareness by R&D professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research 6, 175–196.

Setiawaty, A. (2016). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism on Banking Performance with Risk Management as an Intervening Variable. Journal of Economics and Management.

Tambun, S. (2013). Data Processing Techniques and Interpretation of Research Results Using SPSS Program For Variable Moderating. Jakarta: University Publishing Agency 17 August 1945.

Widyawati, N. (2017). The Effect of Trust and Commitment and Service Marketing Mix on Customer Loyalty in Za- Hotels Kiah Medan. Journal of Economics and Finance.

Zubir, Hasan, A., and Basri, Y. (2016). The Effect of Budget Participation on Managerial Performance with Job Relevant Information (JRI) and Cost Management Knowledge as a Moderating Variable (Empirical Study on Banking Companies in Pekanbaru. Journal Economics, 24(3).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/rima.v4i2.3151