Effectiveness Between Mango Honey and Kesambi Honey As Antibacterial Against Streptococcus Pyogenes

Salvador BHWD Borromeu, Endang Isbandiati, Adi Pramono

Abstract


Introduction: Infectious disease is one of the biggest health problems in developing countries, including Indonesia. The development of the discovery of antibiotics was not balanced with the development of resistance that occurred after that Group A streptococcus β hemolytic causes various events of a severe degree of infection. Now many people use natural ingredients as an alternative to antibiotics, one of which is honey. Aim: Knowing the benefits of mango honey and kesambi honey as an antibacterial against Streptococcus pyogenes and knowing the difference in the effectiveness and potency to inhibit growth and kill Streptococcus pyogenes between the two honey. Method: Using the macro dilution method in determining the value of MIC and the streaking method to determine the value of MBC. Results: MIC mango honey at 15.625 µL, MIC kesambi honey at 15.625 µL, MBC mango honey at 15.625 µL, and MBC kesambi honey at 31.25 µL. Conclusion: There is a difference of MBC between mango honey and kesambi honey against Streptococcus pyogenes where mango honey at 15.625 µL and kesambi honey at 31.25 µL, there is no difference in MIC between mango honey and kesambi honey, and the effectiveness and potency of mango honey as an antibacterial against Sp higher than kesambi honey which was observed through differences in the value of MBC.

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aniq A, Mutsaqof N, Suryani E, Kom SSM. Sistem Pakar Untuk Mendiagnosis Penyakit Infeksi Menggunakan Forward Chaining. 2015;4(1):43–7.

Ventola CL. The Antibiotic Resistance Crisis Part 1 : Causes and Threats. 2015;40(4):277–83.

Suwarto S. Penyakit Tropik dan Infeksi pada Abad 21 : Apakah Masih Relevan ? 2019;77–8.

Leboffe MJ, Pierce BE. A Photographic Atlas For The 4th Edition Microbiology Laboratory. Englewood, CO: Morton Pub. Co.; 2011.

Bhatia R, Ichhpujani RL. Essentials Of Medical Microbiology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2008.

Winarno FG. Madu: Teknologi, Khasiat, dan Analisa. Jakarta Timur: Ghalia Indonesia; 1982.

Johnson S, Nimisha J. Antibiotic Residues In Honey. Dalam: Center for Science and Environment. New Delhi: Tughlakabad Institutional Area; 2010.

Mulu A, Tessema B, Derbie F. In Vitro Assessment Of The Antimicrobial Potential Of Honey On Common Human Pathogens. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2005;18(2).

Kamaruddin. Khasiat Madu. Kuala Lumpur: Departement of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas of Malaya; 2002.

Parwata IOA, Ratnayani K, Listya A. Aktivitas Antiradikal Bebas Serta Kadar Beta Karoten Pada Madu Randu (Ceiba pentandra) Dan Madu Kelengkeng (Nephelium longata L.). J Kim 4. 2010;4(1):54–62.

Tille PM. Bailey’s & Scotts’s Diagnostic Microbiology. Fourteenth. St.Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2017.

Zulhawa DJ. Daya Hambat Madu Sumbawa Terhadap Pertumbuhan Kuman Staphylococcus aureus Isolat Infeksi Luka Operasi RS Islam Amal Sehat Sragen. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret: 2010.

Putu N, Savitri T, Hastuti ED, Widodo S, Suedy A. Kualitas Madu Lokal dari Beberapa Wilayah di Kabupaten Temanggung. Bul Anat dan Fisiol. 2017;2(1):58–66.

Shugaba A. Analysis of Biochemical Composition of Honey Samples from North-East Nigeria. Biochemistry & Analytical Biochemistry. 2012;2(3).

Minarti S, Jaya F, Merlina PA. Pengaruh Masa Panen Madu Lebah Pada Area Tanaman Kaliandra (Caliandra Calothyrsus) Terhadap Jumlah Produksi, Kadar Air, Viskositas, dan Kadar Gula Madu. J Ilmu dan Teknol Has Ternak. 2016;11(1):46–51.

Andriani M, Utami R, Hariyati LF. Aktivitas Antibakteri Berbagai Jenis Madu Terhadap Bakteri Pembusuk (Pseudomonas fluorescens FNCC 0071 dan Pseudomonas putida FNCC 0070). Biomedika [Internet]. 2012;5(1). Available from: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/13215/1/Publikasi_Jurnal_(7).pdf.

Samaranayake L. Essential Microbiology for Dentistry. 4th ed. St. Louis: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2012. 58-59 p.

Hikmawati, Noor A., Natzir H. Hikmawati, Mikro Mineral Essensial (Co, Ni dan V) serta Sifat Bio-Fisika Kimia pada Madu Asal Mallawa. Jurusak Kim Fak Mat dan Ilmu Pengetah Alam, Univ Hasanudin. 2013;1–8.

Gulfraz M, Iftikhar F, Imran M, Zeenat A, Asif S, Shah I. Compositional analysis and antimicrobial activity of various honey types of Pakistan. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2011;46(2):263–7.

Honey-Health and Therapeutic Qualities. USA: The National Honey Board; 2003. Available from: Http://www.jorgensensapiary.com/pdf/compedium.pdf.

Ray B, Bhunia AK. Fundamental Food Microbiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.

Ambarwati, Enda F, Utami DF. Pengaruh Pemberian Larutan Ekstrak Jeruk Nipis (Citrus aurantifolio) Terhadap Pembentukan Plak Gigi. Fakultas Kedokteran: 2012. Available from: http://eprints. undip.ac.id/ 37540.

Suriawiria U. Pengantar Mikrobiologi Umum. Angkasa Bandung; 2000.

Gunawan R. Uji Fitokimia dan Penentuan Aktivitas Antioksidan Dari Madu Trigona Incisa. 2018;18–21.

Eleazu CO, Iroaganachi MA, Eleazu KC, Okoronkwo JO. Determination of the PhysicoChemical Composition, Microbial Quality, and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Some Commercially Sold Honey Samples in Aba, Nigeria: ‘The Effect of Varying Colors. International 187 Journal of Biomedical Research. 2013;4(1):32–41.

Zulhawa DJ, Maryani, Dewi NH. Daya Hambat Madu Sumbawa terhadap Pertumbuhan Staphylococcus aureus Isolat Infeksi Luka Operasi. Biofarmasi. 2014;12(1):40–4.

Nadhilla NF. The Activity Of Antibacterial Agent Of Honey Against Staphylococcus aureus. JukeKedokteranUnilaAcId. 2014;3:94–101.

Molan PC. The Antibacterial Activity of Honey. Bee World. 1992;73(2):59–76.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/jwmj.v2i3.2663

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.